Productivity applications help groups of people, mostly employees, to get more work done in less time through effective collaboration and communication. If these apps are used prudently, it can help you organize workflow, boost individual and team productivity and improve work-life balance. But when companies use different tools for messaging and collaboration, it results in communication silos. Searching and finding the right information becomes an impossible task. Moreover, you might miss out on key business insights, toggling between different applications.
According to Mobility, Performance and Engagement report, 42% of the employees have said that the ability to access information quickly and easily has the greatest impact on how productive they are.
Apart from email and instant messaging apps, companies use calendar apps to schedule meetings, cloud storage apps for document creation and sharing, screen sharing and video apps for conference calls etc. Managing dozens of tools and apps is time and cost consuming. Using different tools and apps may lead to missed project deadlines and deliveries. This blog will talk about how Flock and its best alternative Clariti stack up.
Increase productivity by 50% | Email, chat, to-do in one app Sign up for free!
The best way to deal with this problem would be to create a unified collaboration platform, where every member of the team has quick access to the information anywhere, anytime. Integrating all your apps into one platform can help you to streamline workflow and focus more on business development.
Let’s look at two such tools – Flock and Clariti. Before deciding on the pros and cons and making the comparison study, we installed and worked on both the tools for some time. Although they might look similar at first glance, this blog will help you to choose the right fit.
Best Microsoft Team’s alternative | Sign up for free!
Flock is one of the popular communications and collaboration apps for modern teams and businesses. Flock packs more features under chat and channels and it is relatively more affordable when compared with bigger counterparts like Slack. It supports some of the features like shared notes, reminders, to-dos, polls etc. You can also make audio and video calls and share your screen with your remote team. Flock is available in all formats like web, desktop and mobile. One of the most distinguishable features of Flock is it supports the app in 4 different languages.
In Flock, most of the work can be done only with integrations, including emails. Though Mailcast (app for sending emails) comes pre-installed, it is still a separate application, and you definitely need some help before you learn to send your first email. Integrations come with their own set of challenges. You may need an expert team to install and address post-integration issues. Apart from this, complex data mapping and limitations posed by APIs can cause further problems.
For integrations to work, you will have to subscribe to more applications and there are other costs like upgrading, customization, training etc. On the other hand, a single, integrated, all-in-one communication platform can slash your total cost of ownership by over 50%.
Best Communication software | Powered by AI | Get started for free!
Clariti is one of the best flock alternatives that is designed to avoid silos and enhance productivity within teams. To achieve this, Clariti harnesses the power of no channels – all conversations are had in contexts instead. This means that users can avoid searching for relevant threads, as the system will prompt them with all conversations related to a specified context in one place. With the ability to traverse contexts easily, users slash the time wasted switching between team forums, emails and file versions like never before! Clariti saves time and increases efficiency on collaborative tasks – try it today!
Subject chats can provide a more focused environment for conversation compared to chatting on channels. This allows conversations to flow more naturally, while also allowing people to get into deeper topics with greater clarity and detail.
In addition, subject chats can be tailored specifically to the interests of the chat participants, which makes it easier to reach a common ground for discourse that extends beyond mere surface-level interests. That said, using channels instead of subject chats has its own advantages.
For example, it provides a platform for broader and less structured conversations, which can be beneficial for spontaneous discussions about creative ideas and developments in the field. Ultimately, choosing between channels and subject chats is a matter of deciding what kind of interaction best suits the particular context.
|Subject-chats usually involve a specific topic or purpose which is outlined by the initiator ahead of time.||Conversely, channel-based communication tools allow conversations from all participants without an overarching structure.|
|Subject-chats users often need to be invited or opt into a particular conversation||In Channel-based communication tools anyone within the organization or team can view the conversation at any given time.|
|Any user can initiate a subject-chat and add or remove participants at any time.||For channels there are restrictions on who can create channels depending upon the tool itself; in most cases it requires an admin or appointed representative to open up a new channel for ongoing dialogue.|
|Subject-chats provide superior communication experiences relative to channel-based tools due to their powerful ability to contextualize conversations from the first one to the last.||Channel users are often interrupted by frequent notifications from irrelevant conversations.|
|Subject chats provide clarity by succinctly summarizing the topic of a conversation instead of needing to search for context in long chat threads.||In channels there are no context, and it is very difficult to find out who is talking about what.|
|Subject chats avoid silos by helping teams easily manage conversations based on their topics or tasks.||Channels create silos as conversations are spread all over the place.|
|Every conversation has a subject—and with subject-chats this subject ties together every message in the chat, from the first one to the last.||In channels, there are only random conversations, and it lacks subject.|
|Subject chats provide context which helps others minimize time spent during an information gathering process by preventing users from straying too far away from a given topic allowing everyone in a chatroom more efficiently reach consensus without getting derailed.||Channels encourage conversations without context, and it results in unwanted noise.|
|Additionally, subject chats are tailored towards how people naturally communicate throughout meetings and conversations so teammates can understand the importance without having to look through multiple channels for information.||Channels are full of noise. Users end up going through conversations that are irrelevant to them.|
|By having all communication located in one place, it makes it easier for individuals to concentrate on their tasks without needing to hop from channel to channel or fear missing important reviews or feedback.||Channels are full of noise and users often end up missing the key point or important deadline.|
By knowing these key differences between subject-chats and channel-based communication tools, you can make an informed decision about what works best for your organization or team’s needs!
Communicate confidently with Topic Threads | Try Clariti now, It’s free!
A subject chat is a type of chat technology that allows members to avoid the silos of traditional email systems, instead communicating in context about a specific subject. It does so by eliminating the need for channels, making it easy for conversation subjects to remain grouped together and avoid cluttered inboxes.
Members no longer need to remember which inbox contains what content, since there is no searching necessary — participants can just subscribe to the conversation itself and be kept up-to-date on whatever needs discussing. All this combined helps improve productivity and eliminate information gaps between team members and departments.
By leveraging these features, teams will be better equipped to communicate efficiently and complete projects with ease.
Clariti is one of the best flock alternatives for businesses and teams of all sizes that offers solutions for teams to improve their collaboration. Clariti’s features ensure that tasks are completed accurately and in a timely manner. With these powerful features at their disposal, teams can work together from any location around the world, thus boosting productivity and enabling more effective collaboration between team members.
Replace email | Use chat instead | Start Free Trial!
As an organization, if you already have a lot of applications that need to talk to each other and if you can afford in-house integration specialists, then you can go with Flock.
On the other hand, Clariti is one of the best flock alternatives that is more of a unified digital work system that pulls together all your work including email, chat, cloud storage, social feeds etc in one place. Using Clariti, you can quickly find any information you want in just a few seconds, without toggling between different apps. Clariti will help you prioritize and focus on important tasks without any distractions, so that you can achieve more professionally and personally. If you are looking for a solution to improve collaboration and communication among your remote workforce, then choose Clariti.
Leave a Comment